Skip to content

Conversation

@danilrwx
Copy link
Contributor

@danilrwx danilrwx commented Dec 22, 2025

Description

Add qouta exclude labels for VI/CVI importers pods. Thats required for exclude resource used during creating of VD/VI/CVI.

Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?

Do not take into account resources used during the creation of VI, CVI, VD, which will be deleted later.

What is the expected result?

Importer pods and scratch pvc should have resource-quota-overrides.deckhouse.io/ignore label.

Checklist

  • The code is covered by unit tests.
  • e2e tests passed.
  • Documentation updated according to the changes.
  • Changes were tested in the Kubernetes cluster manually.

Changelog entries

section: core
type: feature
summary: Exclude from qouta system resources for CVI/VI/VD.

@danilrwx danilrwx force-pushed the feat/api/cvi-vi-quota-exclude branch 9 times, most recently from ba270ab to 2d404ce Compare December 29, 2025 13:24
@danilrwx danilrwx force-pushed the feat/api/cvi-vi-quota-exclude branch from 8278b4f to c3d4291 Compare January 14, 2026 07:30
@danilrwx danilrwx changed the title feat(api) VI/CVI exclude pod's from quota feat(core): exclude from qouta system resources for CVI/VI/VD. Jan 14, 2026
@danilrwx danilrwx changed the title feat(core): exclude from qouta system resources for CVI/VI/VD. feat(core): exclude from qouta system resources for CVI/VI/VD Jan 14, 2026
@danilrwx danilrwx added this to the v1.5.0 milestone Jan 14, 2026
@danilrwx danilrwx marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2026 09:23
@danilrwx danilrwx force-pushed the feat/api/cvi-vi-quota-exclude branch from c3d4291 to e4fcef1 Compare January 14, 2026 13:59
@danilrwx danilrwx requested a review from fl64 as a code owner January 14, 2026 13:59
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <[email protected]>
@danilrwx danilrwx force-pushed the feat/api/cvi-vi-quota-exclude branch from e4fcef1 to 5a8d010 Compare January 14, 2026 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants